[Martin]

A1 1111 11111000
A4 1111 00111000

B1 0111 11111000
B4 0111 00111000

C1 1011 11111000
C4 1011 00111000

D1 001111111000
D4 001100111000

E1 1101 11111000
E4 1101 00111000

F1 0101 11111000
F4 0101 00111000
...
K1 1010 11111000
K4 1010 00111000
K16 1010 00001000
...
P1 0000 11111000
P4 0000 00111000


not only 4 that is the homecode?

I also see that the group key has the same binary as the 16th unit

group on:

Code:

Raw code:
295 885 295 885 295 885 1180 295 295 885 295 885 295 885 1180 295 295 885 295 295 295 885 295 295 295 885 295 295 295 885 295 295 295 885 295 885 295 1180 1180 295 295 885 1180 295 295 885 1180 295 295 11505
Binary code:
101000001000

unit 16 on:

Code:

Raw code:
295 885 295 885 295 885 1180 295 295 1180 295 885 295 885 1180 295 295 885 1180 295 295 885 1180 295 295 1180 1180 295 295 1180 1180 295 295 1180 295 1180 295 885 1180 295 295 1180 1180 295 295 1180 1180 295 295 11505
Binary code:
101000001000

[curlymo]

Can you try replacing these functions in arctech_old.c and check if the values are received properly?

Code:

void arctechOldCreateMessage(int id, int unit, int state) {
    char alpha[16] = {"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP"};

    arctech_old.message = json_mkobject();
    json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "id", json_mknumber(id));
    json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "unit", json_mkstring(alpha[unit]));
    if(state == 0)
        json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "state", json_mkstring("on"));
    else
        json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "state", json_mkstring("off"));
}

void arctechOldParseBinary(void) {
    int unit = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 0, 3);
    int state = arctech_old.binary[11];
    int id = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 4, 8)+1;
    arctechOldCreateMessage(id, unit, state);
}

Didn't fix the sending yet so no need to test

[Martin]

Code:

Aug 16 01:37:46] pilight-daemon: DEBUG: called archtech_old parseBinary()
[Aug 16 01:37:46] pilight-daemon: DEBUG: default freq of the lirc_rpi module set
[Aug 16 01:37:46] pilight-daemon: DEBUG: deinitialized lirc_rpi module
[Aug 16 01:37:46] pilight-daemon: DEBUG: removed stale pid_file /var/run/pilight.pid

it quits everytime I try

[curlymo]

And like this:

Code:

void arctechOldCreateMessage(int id, int unit, int state) {
    arctech_old.message = json_mkobject();
    json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "id", json_mknumber(id));
    json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "unit", json_mknumber(unit));
    if(state == 0)
        json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "state", json_mkstring("on"));
    else
        json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "state", json_mkstring("off"));
}

void arctechOldParseBinary(void) {
    int unit = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 0, 3);
    int state = arctech_old.binary[11];
    int id = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 4, 8)+1;
    arctechOldCreateMessage(id, unit, state);
}

[Bram]

Note that without low-pass filter it is common to receive the wrong output from pilight-receive. I have seen the number 31 come by countless times while I did not press it.

In my experience pilight-debug is usually pretty accurate so you should rely on that and pilight-send to check if your switch does change.

Like the sartano protocol this protocol doesn't have a header and has a 2 pulse footer (old_kaku?). First get the latest code from GitHub, then try the following:

Code:

void arctechOldCreateLow(int s, int e) {
    int i;

    for(i=s;i<=e;i+=4) {
        arctech_old.raw[i]=(PULSE_LENGTH);
        arctech_old.raw[i+1]=(arctech_old.pulse*PULSE_LENGTH);
        arctech_old.raw[i+2]=(arctech_old.pulse*PULSE_LENGTH);
        arctech_old.raw[i+3]=(PULSE_LENGTH);
    }
}

void arctechOldCreateHigh(int s, int e) {
    int i;

    for(i=s;i<=e;i+=4) {
        arctech_old.raw[i]=(PULSE_LENGTH);
        arctech_old.raw[i+1]=(arctech_old.pulse*PULSE_LENGTH);
        arctech_old.raw[i+2]=(PULSE_LENGTH);
        arctech_old.raw[i+3]=(arctech_old.pulse*PULSE_LENGTH);
    }
}

arctech_old.pulse = 3.5;

Because

Code:

295 885-1180 885-1180 295 = Low
295 885-1180 295 885-1180 = High

[curlymo]

@Bram, good to join in on this one, but i rather fix the receiving part first, then i will check the sender.

[Martin]

K1 = "id": 32, "unit": 5
K2 = "id": 31, "unit": 5
K3 = "id": 30, "unit": 5
K4 = "id": 29, "unit": 5
K16= "id": 17, "unit": 5

with curlymo his code

[curlymo]

Can you now leave the other function and replace this one:

Code:

void arctechOldParseBinary(void) {
    int i = 0;
    for(i=0;i<arctech_old.length/4;i++) {
        arctech_old.binary[i] ^= 1;
    }
    int unit = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 0, 3);
    int state = arctech_old.binary[11];
    int id = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 4, 8)+1;
    arctechOldCreateMessage(id, unit, state);
}

[Martin]

Look good.

K1 = ID 1 unit 10
K2 = ID 2 unit 10
K4 = ID 4 unit 10
K16 = ID 16 unit 10

A1 = ID 1 unit 0
A16 = ID 16 unit 0

only the ON and OFF states are switched again

[curlymo]

Can you now try these:

Code:

void arctechOldCreateMessage(int id, int unit, int state) {
    char letters[16] = {"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO"};

    arctech_old.message = json_mkobject();
    json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "id", json_mknumber(id));
    json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "unit", json_mkstring(letters[unit]));
    if(state == 1)
        json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "state", json_mkstring("on"));
    else
        json_append_member(arctech_old.message, "state", json_mkstring("off"));
}

void arctechOldParseBinary(void) {
    int i = 0;
    for(i=0;i<arctech_old.length/4;i++) {
        arctech_old.binary[i] ^= 1;
    }
    int unit = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 0, 3);
    int state = arctech_old.binary[11];
    int id = binToDec(arctech_old.binary, 4, 8)+1;
    arctechOldCreateMessage(id, unit, state);
}